Obviously, the question of lateral entry into the civil services is an old one. Abdul Kalam), engineers (K. Out of the 6,000 applicants from the private sector who applied for 10 posts of joint secretary in the Central government last year, 89 have been shortlisted, sources say. They blazed a largely individual trail of success, which got swamped under the sheer numbers of the civil service officials they were surrounded by. Varadrajan, K.Until now.In December last year, the personnel ministry decided to entrust the task of selecting the candidates for these posts to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).The slow progress, say our sources, is due to the need to carefully shepherd the policy through the thicket of babu opposition. And bitterly disputed and resisted by babus who want to keep outsiders at bay. The UPSC had then asked all such asp***ts to fill a detailed application form (DAF) to obtain additional specific information from the candidates regarding qualifications and experience so as to facilitate the selection process. Even now the Modi sarkar is stepping carefully so as not to offend the eggshell egos of the powerful IAS lobby. Patel, L. Nambiar) and visionary entrepreneurs (Sam Pitroda)..

Chari, Mantosh Sondhi, S.The Modi government’s move on lateral entry into government is inching along. During this programme the nation saw the induction of such high priests of the public sector as V.P.Though there have been individual instances of lateral entry in nearly every government at the Centre, it is only this Modi sarkar which has formulated a formal more all-round policy on lateral entry. These posts are in revenue, financial services, economic affairs, agriculture and farmers welfare, road transport and highways, shipping, environment, forests and climate change, new and renewable energy, civil aviation and commerce departments.According to sources, of these 89 candidates, 14 each are for the posts of joint secretary in agriculture cooperation and farmers welfare, and shipping, 13 for aviation, 10 for the department of financial services, nine each for the departments of revenue and new and renewable energy, eight for road transport and highways, seven for environment, forest and climate change, three for department of economic affairs and two for the commerce department.

K.Since then, technocrats have been bopp metallized film brought in from time to time, mostly as economists — I. Jha (former RBI governors), Montek Singh Ahluwalia (erstwhile Planning Commission) — scientists (Dr A. The present policy has the backing of the Niti Aayog. Earlier too, the Sixth Pay Commission and the Second Administrative Reforms Commission had strongly recommended lateral entry.G.Will the lateral entry mode, which relates to the appointment of specialists from the private sector in government organisations and considered one of the Modi government’s “pet” projects, bring in fresh talent in bureaucracy? But with only a few months remaining for the general elections, it is unlikely that Mr Modi’s pet project will fructify before the new government is formed.P. The first concerted effort was made way back in 1959 when, feeling the need to bring in private sector specialists into some positions, the government set up the Industrial Management Pool (IMP). The objective was to hire talent to fill middle and high-level positions.J.Naturally, there was a pushback from the babus who saw their turf being stolen, and the programme finally ended in 1973. Krishnamurthy (SAIL, BHEL and Maruti), Prakash Lal Tandon (State Trading Corporation of India, Punjab National Bank and the National Council of Applied Economic Research), and technocrat Lovraj Kumar (secretary, petroleum ministry), among others.R.C.P

This time, Mr Nihalani’s seeking of 89 cuts in the film and targeting film-maker Anurag Kashyap took both the government and the BJP by surprise.Hinting at possible changes in film certification, I&B minister Arun Jaitley said on Friday that “some very radical changes” will be announced over the next few days.Time might be running out for Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) chief Pahalaj Nihalani. Certification norms will have to be liberal.” The I&B minister said that he “looks at the big picture” and that “the big picture is a certification board. Over the next few days we are going to announce some very radical changes in that.” Speaking in Mumbai, Mr Nihalani refused to comment, saying the matter was now in court.Playing down the ongoing controversy, Mr Jaitley said, “I think that we are overstating it because at the end of the day you have a board which takes a view which may be a little conservative view. As per earlier media reports, Chirag is a creative producer associated with all promotional material related to the film, including its trailer, while Radhika is reportedly part of the film’s marketing team.

A section of top BJP functionaries feel that Mr Nihalani “has become a liability rather than an asset”. My experience has been almost everything then gets cleared.”With the Bombay high court on Friday reminding Mr Nihalani that his “job is to certify films, not censor them”, trouble mounted for the CBFC chief who had earlier declared that he was “proud to be the PM’s chamcha (sycophant)”. The BJP, which is fighting with its back to the wall in the forthcoming Punjab polls, felt the controversy created Mr Nihalani was giving the advantage to the Congress and AAP, both of which have metalized polyester “dared” Punjab’s ruling Shiromani Akali Dal to screen the film. Besides his “proud to be the PM’s chamcha” remark, his accusation that Mr Kashyap has “taken money from AAP” did not go down well with the BJP. That his pride in being the PM’s “chamcha” was not appreciated by the government became evident when Union minister for communications and information technology Ravi Shankar Prasad said, “The Pradhan Mantri doesn’t need any sycophants.”. While Mr Nihalani’s son and daughter-in-law are quiet about their involvement in Udta Punjab, questions are now being asked about why the CBFC chief was allegedly targeting the films after the trailer was released.”

He added: “We popularly call it censor board and you have the appeal tribunal. But then, at the appeal tribunal, with an appeal it can get disposed of. Now, whenever you have a problem at the level of the first body, people go to the next slab, and in almost 99 per cent of the cases, with or without some changes, it gets cleared by the next body. Speaking to a TV channel, he said, “There is a well documented report by Shyam Benegal, the first part of which has come to me and which is under consideration. Speculation is rife that Mr Benegal could replace the controversial CBFC chairman.” Mr Jaitley, who remains one of the liberal faces of the BJP and the Modi government, told the channel, “The correct word is certification, and not censorship. After the Udta Punjab controversy blew up in the government’s face, the I&B ministry is seriously examining the Shyam Benegal report. His statements and handling of the CBFC have also not gone down well with the government, which has been facing criticism over “saffronisation of institutions”.Reports have emerged revealing that Mr Nihalani’s son Chirag, and Chirag’s wife Radhika, are part of the production and marketing teams of the film Udta Punjab

One cannot dismiss the success of these films. “You cannot that 2017 hasn’t seen even a single hit film. “I remember this theatre, Lotus Cinema, in Worli that used to keep really low rates for their tickets and even offered passes.”.Trade analyst Taran Adarsh begs to differ. With Dangal, Aamir completely changed himself. Hrithik Roshan’s Kaabil and Shah Rukh Khan’s Raees didn’t do exceptionally well either with respect to the previous responses these actors have received for their work. Even as Baahubali 2 turned out to be a roaring success at the box office, it wasn&aluminized PET film Manufacturers39;t # essentially a Bollywood production. “After the success of the first film in the Baahubali franchise, the makers very evidently expanded their market — instead of confining their audiences to just the south, they aimed at making it a big release throughout the country. One of the most obvious examples is Vishal Bhardwaj’s highly anticipated film Rangoon starring Kangana Ranaut, Shahid Kapoor and Saif Ali Khan in the lead roles that didn’t manage to recover the money they spent on the big production. “Bollywood is keen on making copies of films. While Hindi Medium did exceptionally well for being a small budget film, Baahubali 2 wasn’t exactly a Bollywood production.

In fact, the film was dubbed by critics as a flop. “If someone puts together a film that is insulting the audience’s mindset, they won’t turn up to watch your film,” he warns, adding “Alia Bhatt and Varun Dhawan’s Badrinath ki Dulhaniya wasn’t exactly a sequel but was a part of a franchise where the second one didn’t manage to do well. With a paunch and seemingly real countryside characteristics, he broke free and lived his character fully, thus, delivering a super hit. In fact, both Raees and Kaabil did fairly well despite opening against each other at the box office,” he states. He explains that several movies releasing today end up following the same old formula, are sequels or just lack a strong script. What are Badrinath ki Dulhaniya, Baahubali 2 and Hindi Medium?” he questions. Bollywood’s report card for the last six months shows that despite several big productions on the market, many of the films haven’t even managed to break-even let alone make the kind of profit that Dangal and Sultan had made just last year. No matter how big a star he is, he always plays the role of a simple Simon on the screen. Rangoon was an out and out flop because the film lacked a strong script following which it couldn’t recover the money invested.

It is six months into 2017, but Bollywood still hasn’t managed to deliver a single blockbuster hit.Multiplexes charge a lot of money for their films these days — a ticket غير مجاز مي باشدts anywhere between Rs 400 to Rs 500 even for an ordinary theatre, explains analyst Vinod M***i.Trade analyst Omar Qureshi says this is a classic case of ‘you sow what you reap’.Omar points out that the reason Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan and Aamir Khan deliver blockbusters is because they manage to shed their stardom and play characters. He says, “Take Salman, for instance. Because India has such a variety of cultures, it gets difficult to please all the groups. Our country has a rich culture but that isn’t reflected in our films — we make too many (disappointing) copies,” he states. Point that out and Taran explains that their vision was pan-India. “Audiences don’t want to pay so much for an average film that doesn’t bring anything new to the table,” he says, adding that multiplexes often increase their rates when the film of a Baahubali 2 or Tubelight calibre is due to release. This let a lot of students and young people to watch films, thereby increasing the returns,” he recalls.”Trade analyst Kumar Mohan elaborates the reasons why Bollywood goes wrong with its films

Sumeet Vyas from the series Permanent Roommates is my co-star. They left in a mad rush. But I share a strange relationship with him. I met my father only on weekends and special occasions.Kalki Koechlin, who made her Bollywood debut with Dev D, has come a long way. We shot the film in Jharkhand, which is a four-hour drive from Ranchi. Logistically it was tough for Konkona to cart the entire crew to Jharkhand. It’s her first feature. While initially Bollywood and Indian cinema found it difficult to slot Kalki’s Caucasian look, both, the actress and the Indian movie industry seem to have made peace with it.So who came up with the idea of doing a travel show Initially my Dad did. By then, I had other engagements. We’d travel four hours every day and it was exhausting. I haven’t seen the film yet. I then thought of making our trip into a show. But I am happy for Konkona. How different is it from working with male directors Yes, I’ve worked with Shonali Bose in Margarita With a Straw and Zoya Akhtar in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobaara.

Koko (Kokona) is quiet but she knows exactly what she wants from each actor. In fact, they completed the film just a few days before it was taken to Toronto. We then shifted to the location and stayed in local homes. In a candid chat, Kalki talks to us about her film, her travel show and upcoming projects.When does A Death In the Gunj release in India It will be released soon.How did the crew manage in the wilderness Initially we stayed in Ranchi and drove down to the location. He said, ‘Listen, we haven’t travelled for years.What are you shooting for currently It’s a film called Ribbon.Konkona Sen Sharma’s directorial debut A Death In the Gunj was very well received at the Toronto Film Festival Yes, I am very happy about that. It’s directed by Rakhi Shandilya, another female director. My parents separated when I was a child. It was thrilling to go trekking with him.You have worked with female directors before. But she insisted on it since the location in the script matched Jharkhand.

But yes, each of my female directors has pronounced personality traits. He is a nature photographer.You recently took an amazing road trip with your dad Joel Koechlin for a travel show It was quite an experience travelling all across the Northeast. Our meetings were sporadic but whenever we met, we had fun. You know, I always felt close to my dad. Zoya is like one of the boys: boisterous. I wanted to be in Toronto for the screening but I was told very late about it. Gender definitely doesn’t play a part. The last time we went together was to Gulmarg four years ago. They want to create a buzz before release..’ He wanted us to travel to the Northeast because we had never been to that part of the world. Her latest film Both Sides PVDC Coated PET Film A Death In the Gunj has just been released to tremendous ovation at the Toronto Film Festival. Kalki is also making her presence felt in theatre and make her voice her about social/feminist issues